ALL PARLIAMENTARIANS
Only about 50% of MP's bother to open emails. I can understand them not answering emails they don't think are worthwhile answering, but to do so before they open them indicates they have powers of perceptions beyond my comprehension. An acknowledgment of an email is rare. An answer is extremely rare. and any sign of interest in the subject matter is far rarer.
BEAZLEY
2006 06_07_MacAulay_Beazley Not answered
CHAPMAN
2007_08_11_MacAulay_Chapman Not Answered
COONAN
2008_09_30_Coonan_MacAulay Reply to ASIC Oversight Committee email
COSTELLO
2005_12_29 Letter from A.C. Tai to Costello Not answered
DUTTON
Westpoint investors regard the Assistant Treasurer's Office as the "Ministry of Truth" (from the book 1984). The replies from Peter Dutton's Office speak for themselves. Ms. Joanne Hutchinson's letters show how little the Howard Government cares about those they govern. Her content-free missives missiles tacitly refuse to answer every question put to the Assistant Treasurer's Office. Her voluminous rubbish must be responsible for at least one forest suffering severe degradation.
2006_06_26_MacAulay_Dutton It was to take four moths for a reply that did not answer a single question.
2006_09_16_MacAulay_Hutchinson An attack on Dutton's Office and a number of factual observations;
2006_10_26_Dutton to MacAulay Four months later, and no answer!
2006_12_17 Dutton to Windsor Against all the evidence, isn't ASIC marvellous?
2007_01_29 Dutton to Boffa In praise of an appalling ASIC performance
2007_01_29_MacAulay_Bartley A request for a Parliamentary inquiry into the performance to date. Nothing ever came of it
2007_07_10_Hutchinson_xxxxxxxx A rebuttal of responsibilty on ASIC's part for their inability to recognise a Managed Investment Scheme when they had the evidence before them. XXXXX is not a WIG member.
2007_07_25_MacAulay_Hutchison A rebuttal of false claims, and further proof of ASIC's failures Of Course, there was no answer to this document.
2007_09_19_Hutchinson_MacAulay Another defence of ASIC - I think.
2007_10_02_MacAulay_Hutchinson A logical argument that even an "Adviser" and a request to answer two simple questions.
2007_10_10_Hutchinson_MacAulay A defence of FICS (a private company), and more propaganda.
2007_10_12_MacAulay_Hutchinson Question on why the Assistant Treasurer's defended a private company and a request to answer the two questions asked in 3007_10_02_MacAulay_Hutchinon.
HOCKEY
2006_07_25_Hockey_WIG_Member Joe Hockey was the first (and only) Minister for ASIC. He signed this document 10 days after the WA Supreme Court found Westpoint Mezzanine Schemes were unregistered (illegal) Managed Investment Schemes. I converted the original letter and have annotated it in 2006_07_25_Hockey
EDWARDS
2006_10_10_Edwards_WIG_Member Labor writes to ASIC/Treasury on 5 occasions
HOWARD
2006_06_30_MacAulay_Howard Not answered
2006_12_12_MacAulay_Howard Not answered
2007_02_15_MacAulay_Howard Not answered
2007_05_31_MacAulay_Howard Not answered
2007_06_29_Howard_MacAulay Not in his portfolio - sent to Assistant Treasurer
MURPHY
PEARCE
2007_06_01_MacAulay_Pearce Not answered
RUDD
2007_05_16_MacAulay_Rudd Not answered
RUDDOCK
SHERRY
2007_07_30_Sherry_MacAulay Enter Rudd in search to go to promise of open inquiry into past ASIC performance.
2008_06_25_MacAulay_Sherry Questions sent to press relating to Burnard's sentence
2008_09_03_MacAulaySherry Questions arising from Burnard Trial & sentence
2008_09_25_SherryMacAulay A politician's reply
2008_10_19_MacAulay Sherry My answer to the communication of 2008_09_25
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============
Timeline/Need for Royal Commission
=============